NYC Debt Collection Attorneys Wish You a Happy Holiday!
We wish you and your families and friends a healthy Happy Holiday season! From Frank, Frank, Goldstein & Nager P.C., your New York Debt Collection Attorneys.
We wish you and your families and friends a healthy Happy Holiday season! From Frank, Frank, Goldstein & Nager P.C., your New York Debt Collection Attorneys.
We wish you and your families and friends a healthy Happy Holiday season! From Frank, Frank, Goldstein & Nager P.C., your New York Debt Collection Attorneys.
Credit Card companies are accused of including arbitration clauses in their card holder agreements for the purposes of avoiding possible class action litigation.
Goods were sold to your customer, delivered as specified. The goods were sold on terms which were not honored. You did not retain a security interest in the goods. Despite attempts to collect, the customer has failed to pay.
Absent fraud or other wrongdoing, principals of corporations remains shielded from liability for corporate debts. This limitation in New York debt collection litigation leaves creditors frustrated. An article that appeared in this week’s Wall Street Journal highlighted China’s policy to rate citizens based upon their moral and
In a contested debt collection litigation, mediation or arbitration, you may be asked to document time billed.
Frank, Frank, Goldstein & Nager New York Debt Collection Lawyers are proud to have been featured in Accounting Today’s September 2016 issue.
Your New York debt collection claim is for non-payment of the monies owed pursuant to a contract that has an auto renewal clause. The balance would have covered your costs or represents your profit on the job.
A house is only as strong as it’s foundation. Following that logic, part of engaging a debt collection law firm to handle your New York debt collection case should include an examination of the firms’ infrastructure.
Defendants continued to deny they owed the monies due under the loan claiming the loan was for someone else’s benefit. Although the terms were clear: sixty (60) installments, thirteen (13) payments made, clearly a defaulted loan. The borrower brought the other party that benefited into the case. All parties asserted claims